Quantcast

East Michigan News

Friday, October 4, 2024

U.S. lawmakers discuss risks posed by certain Chinese companies

Webp 80lf1k3z0avlok87bghq5onr7fpm

Congressman John Moolenaar Chairman of the Select Committee on the CCP | Official U.S. House headshot

Congressman John Moolenaar Chairman of the Select Committee on the CCP | Official U.S. House headshot

Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI) and Ranking Member Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party participated in a bipartisan discussion at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) about the risk certain Chinese companies pose to U.S. national security.

The Chairman and Ranking Member each delivered opening remarks followed by a panel discussion moderated by AEI Senior Fellow Marc Thiessen. The focus was on several Chinese companies operating in the United States that could disrupt supply chains and steal American intellectual property.

Chairman Moolenaar described the "loaded gun" threat: "Looking for a 'smoking gun' though is the wrong way to think about China-related risk. After all, a smoking gun means a shot has already been fired. Demanding to see smoking guns before taking action puts policymakers into a reactive posture. When our country’s leaders have failed to connect the dots and take action, there have been catastrophic consequences including Pearl Harbor and 9/11," said Chairman Moolenaar. "This is strategically unwise and financially ruinous. Consequently, I would like to spend some time outlining why we need to be looking not for 'smoking guns' but instead 'loaded guns'– Chinese companies that because of the technology they provide or the supply chains they impact, pose an unacceptable risk to our country’s security."

Moolenaar specifically mentioned Chinese companies BGI Group, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), and ZPMC.

He continued, "Going forward, we need to be asking whether a given company, through its technology or supply chain reach, could provide the CCP with the ability to threaten our national or economic security interests. If the answer is yes, we need to act with the presumption that the company in question will one day be used by the CCP to threaten our national security, and then we need to take appropriate steps to proactively stop the threat."

The Chairman proposed three key steps:

"First, for the sake of our national security, we need to implement appropriate barriers to our market, particularly in strategic sectors, to prevent malign PRC companies from undermining U.S. technology and undercutting American businesses."

"Second, we need to cut off access to U.S. technology and capital that fuels PRC national champions and critical sectors."

"Finally, while we will lead, we must also coordinate with our allies and encourage them to mirror these steps and secure their own supply chains, technology, and domestic markets."

A recording of the event can be found online.

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS